[REC] vs Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 7.2/10 for [REC]). [REC] is the shorter watch at 1h 18m compared with 2h 15m. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is the older of the two (1992 against 2007). Both are horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| [REC] | Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 1992 |
| Length | 1h 18m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Horror, Mystery | Drama, Horror, Mystery |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Jaume Balagueró, Paco Plaza | David Lynch |
| Main cast | Javier Botet, Manuela Velasco, Ferrán Terraza, Carlos Lasarte, Ben Temple | Pamela Gidley, Mädchen Amick, Miguel Ferrer, Heather Graham, Ray Wise |
Synopsis
[REC]
A television reporter and cameraman follow emergency workers into a dark apartment building and are quickly locked inside with something terrifying.
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
In the questionable town of Deer Meadow, Washington, FBI Agent Desmond inexplicably disappears while hunting for the man who murdered a teen girl. The killer is never apprehended, and, after experiencing dark visions and supernatural encounters, Agent Dale Cooper chillingly predicts that the culprit will claim another life. Meanwhile, in the more cozy town of Twin Peaks, hedonistic beauty Laura Palmer hangs with lowlifes and seems destined for…
Where to watch
Where to watch [REC]Where to watch Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
More like [REC] · More like Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me · Compare other titles
[REC]
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me