Red Cliff II vs Seven Years in Tibet
Red Cliff II and Seven Years in Tibet are tied on audience score (7.3/10). Seven Years in Tibet is the shorter watch at 2h 16m compared with 2h 21m. Seven Years in Tibet is the older of the two (1997 against 2009). Both are adventure, drama, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Red Cliff II | Seven Years in Tibet | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.3/10 | ★ 7.2/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 1997 |
| Length | 2h 21m | 2h 16m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Adventure, Drama, History |
| Country | China | – |
| Director | John Woo | Jean-Jacques Annaud |
| Main cast | Chang Chen, Tony Leung Chiu-wai, Shido Nakamura, Takeshi Kaneshiro, Zhao Wei | David Thewlis, Brad Pitt, Mako, Duncan Fraser, BD Wong |
Synopsis
Red Cliff II
The battle of Red Cliff continues and the alliance between Xu and East Wu is fracturing. With Cao Cao's massive forces on their doorstep, will the kingdoms of Xu and East Wu survive?
Seven Years in Tibet
Austrian mountaineer Heinrich Harrer journeys to the Himalayas without his family to head an expedition in 1939. But when World War II breaks out, the arrogant Harrer falls into Allied forces' hands as a prisoner of war. He escapes with a fellow detainee and makes his way to Lhasa, Tibet, where he meets the 14-year-old Dalai Lama, whose friendship ultimately transforms his outlook on life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Red Cliff IIWhere to watch Seven Years in Tibet
More like Red Cliff II · More like Seven Years in Tibet · Compare other titles
Red Cliff II
Seven Years in Tibet