Red Planet vs Star Trek: First Contact
Star Trek: First Contact has the higher audience score (7.3/10 against 5.7/10 for Red Planet). Red Planet is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 1h 51m. Star Trek: First Contact is the older of the two (1996 against 2000). Both are action, science fiction, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Red Planet | Star Trek: First Contact | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.7/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 1996 |
| Length | 1h 46m | 1h 51m |
| Genres | Action, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Antony Hoffman | Jonathan Frakes |
| Main cast | Carrie-Anne Moss, Simon Baker, Benjamin Bratt, Val Kilmer, Tom Sizemore | Patrick Stewart, Alfre Woodard, Neal McDonough, Adam Scott, James Cromwell |
Synopsis
Red Planet
Astronauts search for solutions to save a dying Earth by searching on Mars, only to have the mission go terribly awry.
Star Trek: First Contact
The Borg, a relentless race of cyborgs, are on a direct course for Earth. Violating orders to stay away from the battle, Captain Picard and the crew of the newly-commissioned USS Enterprise E pursue the Borg back in time to prevent the invaders from changing Federation history and assimilating the galaxy.
Where to watch
Where to watch Red PlanetWhere to watch Star Trek: First Contact
More like Red Planet · More like Star Trek: First Contact · Compare other titles
Red Planet
Star Trek: First Contact