Reeker vs Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 5.6/10 for Reeker). Reeker is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 2h 15m. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is the older of the two (1992 against 2005). Both are horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Reeker | Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.6/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2005 | 1992 |
| Length | 1h 31m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Horror, Mystery | Drama, Horror, Mystery |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Dave Payne | David Lynch |
| Main cast | Arielle Kebbel, Eric Mabius, Christopher Boyer, Michael Ironside, Derek Richardson | Pamela Gidley, Mädchen Amick, Miguel Ferrer, Heather Graham, Ray Wise |
Synopsis
Reeker
Strangers trapped at an eerie travel oasis in the desert must unravel the mystery behind their visions of dying people while they are preyed upon by a decaying creature.
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
In the questionable town of Deer Meadow, Washington, FBI Agent Desmond inexplicably disappears while hunting for the man who murdered a teen girl. The killer is never apprehended, and, after experiencing dark visions and supernatural encounters, Agent Dale Cooper chillingly predicts that the culprit will claim another life. Meanwhile, in the more cozy town of Twin Peaks, hedonistic beauty Laura Palmer hangs with lowlifes and seems destined for…
Where to watch
Where to watch ReekerWhere to watch Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
More like Reeker · More like Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me · Compare other titles
Reeker
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me