Roofman vs To Die For
Roofman has the higher audience score (7.3/10 against 6.6/10 for To Die For). To Die For is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 2h 6m. To Die For is the older of the two (1995 against 2025). Both are comedy, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Roofman | To Die For | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.3/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 1995 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Drama | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Derek Cianfrance | Gus Van Sant |
| Main cast | Ben Mendelsohn, Juno Temple, Peter Dinklage, Uzo Aduba, LaKeith Stanfield | Nicole Kidman, Joaquin Phoenix, Dan Hedaya, Wayne Knight, Illeana Douglas |
Synopsis
Roofman
A former Army Ranger and struggling father turns to robbing McDonald’s restaurants by cutting holes in their roofs, earning him the nickname 'Roofman'. After escaping prison, he secretly lives inside a Toys “R” Us for six months, surviving undetected while planning his next move. But when he falls for a divorced mom drawn to his undeniable charm, his double life begins to unravel, setting off a compelling and suspenseful game of cat and mouse…
To Die For
Suzanne Stone wants to be a world-famous news anchor and she is willing to do anything to get what she wants. What she lacks in intelligence, she makes up for in cold determination and diabolical wiles. As she pursues her goal with relentless focus, she is forced to destroy anything and anyone that may stand in her way, regardless of the ultimate cost or means necessary.
Where to watch
Where to watch RoofmanWhere to watch To Die For
More like Roofman · More like To Die For · Compare other titles
Roofman
To Die For