Runaway Jury vs The Silence of the Lambs
The Silence of the Lambs has the higher audience score (8.3/10 against 6.9/10 for Runaway Jury). The Silence of the Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 59m compared with 2h 7m. The Silence of the Lambs is the older of the two (1991 against 2003). Both are drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Runaway Jury
The Silence of the Lambs| Runaway Jury | The Silence of the Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 8.3/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 1991 |
| Length | 2h 7m | 1h 59m |
| Genres | Drama, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Gary Fleder | Jonathan Demme |
| Main cast | Nick Searcy, Leland Orser, Jennifer Beals, John Cusack, Jeremy Piven | Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster, Brooke Smith, Tracey Walter, Anthony Heald |
Synopsis
Runaway Jury
After a workplace shooting in New Orleans, a trial against the gun manufacturer pits lawyer Wendell Rohr against shady jury consultant Rankin Fitch, who uses illegal means to stack the jury with people sympathetic to the defense. But when juror Nicholas Easter and his girlfriend Marlee reveal their ability to sway the jury into delivering any verdict they want, a high-stakes cat-and-mouse game begins.
The Silence of the Lambs
Clarice Starling is a top student at the FBI's training academy. Jack Crawford wants Clarice to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a brilliant psychiatrist who is also a violent psychopath, serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling, as an attractive young woman, may be just the bait to draw him out.
Where to watch
Where to watch Runaway JuryWhere to watch The Silence of the Lambs
More like Runaway Jury · More like The Silence of the Lambs · Compare other titles