Second in Command vs The Hijacking of the Achille Lauro

The Hijacking of the Achille Lauro has the higher audience score (9/10 against 5.5/10 for Second in Command). Second in Command is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 1h 32m. The Hijacking of the Achille Lauro is the older of the two (1989 against 2006). Both are action movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Second in Command posterSecond in Command2006 VS The Hijacking of the Achille Lauro posterThe Hijacking of the Achille Lauro1989
Second in CommandThe Hijacking of the Achille Lauro
Audience score★ 5.5/10★ 9.0/10
Year20061989
Length1h 31m1h 32m
GenresActionAction, Drama
Country–Australia
DirectorSimon FellowsRobert L. Collins
Main castVelibor Topic, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Raffaello Degruttola, Julie Cox, Elizabeth BarondesLee Grant, Robert Mammone, Christina Pickles, E.G. Marshall, Barry Otto

Synopsis

Second in Command

Armed insurgents attempt a coup d'etat in a troubled Eastern European country, and the president flees to the U.S. embassy for protection. When the U.S. ambassador is murdered by the ruthless and gun-happy rebels, it comes down to the second-in-command of the embassy, Sam Keenan, played by Belgian kickboxer Jean-Claude Van Damme, to use his amazing martial arts technique to defend the besieged.

The Hijacking of the Achille Lauro

The story of the hijacking of the Itallian liner Achille Lauro by four militants of the Palestine Liberation Front, in 1985, who demanded the release of several Palestinians incarcerated in Israeli prisoners. On their hands, lies the fate of several passengers, many Americans included and among them, Jewish American businessman Leon Klinghoffer.

Where to watch

Where to watch Second in CommandWhere to watch The Hijacking of the Achille Lauro

More like Second in Command · More like The Hijacking of the Achille Lauro · Compare other titles