Seven Years in Tibet vs The Lost City of Z
Seven Years in Tibet has the higher audience score (7.2/10 against 6.4/10 for The Lost City of Z). Seven Years in Tibet is the shorter watch at 2h 16m compared with 2h 21m. Seven Years in Tibet is the older of the two (1997 against 2017). Both are adventure, drama, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Seven Years in Tibet
The Lost City of Z| Seven Years in Tibet | The Lost City of Z | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 6.4/10 |
| Year | 1997 | 2017 |
| Length | 2h 16m | 2h 21m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, History | Adventure, Drama, History |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Jean-Jacques Annaud | James Gray |
| Main cast | David Thewlis, Brad Pitt, Mako, Duncan Fraser, BD Wong | Charlie Hunnam, Ian McDiarmid, Franco Nero, Robert Pattinson, Matthew Sunderland |
Synopsis
Seven Years in Tibet
Austrian mountaineer Heinrich Harrer journeys to the Himalayas without his family to head an expedition in 1939. But when World War II breaks out, the arrogant Harrer falls into Allied forces' hands as a prisoner of war. He escapes with a fellow detainee and makes his way to Lhasa, Tibet, where he meets the 14-year-old Dalai Lama, whose friendship ultimately transforms his outlook on life.
The Lost City of Z
A true-life drama in the 1920s, centering on British explorer Col. Percy Fawcett, who discovered evidence of a previously unknown, advanced civilization in the Amazon and disappeared whilst searching for it.
Where to watch
Where to watch Seven Years in TibetWhere to watch The Lost City of Z
More like Seven Years in Tibet · More like The Lost City of Z · Compare other titles