Sherlock: The Abominable Bride vs Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Sherlock: The Abominable Bride has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 4.9/10 for Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough). Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 1h 30m. Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough is the older of the two (2005 against 2016). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Sherlock: The Abominable Bride
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough| Sherlock: The Abominable Bride | Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 4.9/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 2005 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 1h 27m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller, TV Movie | Crime, Drama, Mystery |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Douglas Mackinnon | Jay Lowi |
| Main cast | Mark Gatiss, Benedict Cumberbatch, Martin Freeman, Andrew Scott, Jonathan Aris | Linden Ashby, Claire Coffee, Brad Johnson, Eric Fleeks, Dina Meyer |
Synopsis
Sherlock: The Abominable Bride
Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson find themselves in 1890s London in this holiday special.
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Two young women will stop at nothing for one to gain a $4 million inheritance of two priceless diamonds, while two detectives try to thwart their plans, but find complications abound.
Where to watch
Where to watch Sherlock: The Abominable BrideWhere to watch Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
More like Sherlock: The Abominable Bride · More like Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough · Compare other titles