Soft Shoes vs Tears of the Black Tiger

Soft Shoes has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.5/10 for Tears of the Black Tiger). Soft Shoes is the shorter watch at 46m compared with 1h 50m. Soft Shoes is the older of the two (1925 against 2000). Both are comedy, romance, western movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Soft Shoes posterSoft Shoes1925 VS Tears of the Black Tiger posterTears of the Black Tiger2000
Soft ShoesTears of the Black Tiger
Audience score★ 7.5/10★ 6.5/10
Year19252000
Length46m1h 50m
GenresComedy, Crime, Romance, WesternAction, Comedy, Romance, Western
Country––
DirectorLloyd IngrahamWisit Sasanatieng
Main castJames Quinn, John Steppling, Francis Ford, Harry Carey, Lillian RichSuppakorn Kitsuwan, Chartchai Ngamsan, Stella Malucchi, Passin Reungwoot, Sombat Metanee

Synopsis

Soft Shoes

Sheriff Pat Halahan comes into an inheritance and travels to San Francisco to collect. Faith O’Day, a cat burglar armed with pistol and flashlight breaks into his hotel room and demands that Halahan cough up his dough. Halahan sees her threat and raises her a one-dollar bet that he can return a brooch she stole earlier the same evening before its loss is discovered. Pulling off his boots to slip on his own “soft shoes,” Halahan sets off to do a…

Tears of the Black Tiger

Dum, the son of a peasant falls in love with Rumpoey, the daughter of a wealthy and respected family. The star-crossed lovers are torn apart for years, but their forbidden love survives. When tragedy strikes, Dum unleashes his rage and becomes the gun-slinging outlaw the "Black Tiger" who will stop at nothing to seek his revenge.

Where to watch

Where to watch Soft ShoesWhere to watch Tears of the Black Tiger

More like Soft Shoes · More like Tears of the Black Tiger · Compare other titles