Soldiers of Fortune vs The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring has the higher audience score (8.4/10 against 4.9/10 for Soldiers of Fortune). Soldiers of Fortune is the shorter watch at 1h 34m compared with 2h 59m. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the older of the two (2001 against 2012). Both are action, adventure movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Soldiers of Fortune
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring| Soldiers of Fortune | The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.9/10 | ★ 8.4/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2001 |
| Length | 1h 34m | 2h 59m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure | Action, Adventure, Fantasy |
| Country | – | New Zealand |
| Director | Maksim Korostyshevsky | Peter Jackson |
| Main cast | Christian Slater, Colm Meaney, Ving Rhames, James Cromwell, Gennadi Vengerov | Liv Tyler, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies, Ian McKellen |
Synopsis
Soldiers of Fortune
Wealthy thrill-seekers pay huge premiums to have themselves inserted into military adventures, only this time things don't go exactly to plan.
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Young hobbit Frodo Baggins, after inheriting a mysterious ring from his uncle Bilbo, must leave his home in order to keep it from falling into the hands of its evil creator. Along the way, a fellowship is formed to protect the ringbearer and make sure that the ring arrives at its final destination: Mt. Doom, the only place where it can be destroyed.
Where to watch
Where to watch Soldiers of FortuneWhere to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
More like Soldiers of Fortune · More like The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring · Compare other titles