Soldiers of Fortune vs The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King has the higher audience score (8.5/10 against 4.9/10 for Soldiers of Fortune). Soldiers of Fortune is the shorter watch at 1h 34m compared with 3h 21m. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King is the older of the two (2003 against 2012). Both are action, adventure movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Soldiers of Fortune
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King| Soldiers of Fortune | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.9/10 | ★ 8.5/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2003 |
| Length | 1h 34m | 3h 21m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure | Action, Adventure, Fantasy |
| Country | – | New Zealand |
| Director | Maksim Korostyshevsky | Peter Jackson |
| Main cast | Christian Slater, Colm Meaney, Ving Rhames, James Cromwell, Gennadi Vengerov | Liv Tyler, John Noble, Miranda Otto, Orlando Bloom, John Rhys-Davies |
Synopsis
Soldiers of Fortune
Wealthy thrill-seekers pay huge premiums to have themselves inserted into military adventures, only this time things don't go exactly to plan.
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
As armies mass for a final battle that will decide the fate of the world--and powerful, ancient forces of Light and Dark compete to determine the outcome--one member of the Fellowship of the Ring is revealed as the noble heir to the throne of the Kings of Men. Yet, the sole hope for triumph over evil lies with a brave hobbit, Frodo, who, accompanied by his loyal friend Sam and the hideous, wretched Gollum, ventures deep into the very dark heart…
Where to watch
Where to watch Soldiers of FortuneWhere to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
More like Soldiers of Fortune · More like The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King · Compare other titles