Soldiers of Fortune vs The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers has the higher audience score (8.4/10 against 4.9/10 for Soldiers of Fortune). Soldiers of Fortune is the shorter watch at 1h 34m compared with 2h 59m. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is the older of the two (2002 against 2012). Both are action, adventure movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Soldiers of Fortune | The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.9/10 | ★ 8.4/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2002 |
| Length | 1h 34m | 2h 59m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure | Action, Adventure, Fantasy |
| Country | – | New Zealand |
| Director | Maksim Korostyshevsky | Peter Jackson |
| Main cast | Christian Slater, Colm Meaney, Ving Rhames, James Cromwell, Gennadi Vengerov | Liv Tyler, Miranda Otto, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies |
Synopsis
Soldiers of Fortune
Wealthy thrill-seekers pay huge premiums to have themselves inserted into military adventures, only this time things don't go exactly to plan.
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
Frodo Baggins and the other members of the Fellowship continue on their sacred quest to destroy the One Ring--but on separate paths. Their destinies lie at two towers--Orthanc Tower in Isengard, where the corrupt wizard Saruman awaits, and Sauron's fortress at Barad-dur, deep within the dark lands of Mordor. Frodo and Sam are trekking to Mordor to destroy the One Ring of Power while Gimli, Legolas and Aragorn search for the orc-captured Merry…
Where to watch
Where to watch Soldiers of FortuneWhere to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
More like Soldiers of Fortune · More like The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers · Compare other titles
Soldiers of Fortune
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers