Soldiers of Fortune vs The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers has the higher audience score (8.4/10 against 4.9/10 for Soldiers of Fortune). Soldiers of Fortune is the shorter watch at 1h 34m compared with 2h 59m. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is the older of the two (2002 against 2012). Both are action, adventure movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Soldiers of Fortune posterSoldiers of Fortune2012 VS The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers posterThe Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers2002
Soldiers of FortuneThe Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
Audience score★ 4.9/10★ 8.4/10
Year20122002
Length1h 34m2h 59m
GenresAction, AdventureAction, Adventure, Fantasy
Country–New Zealand
DirectorMaksim KorostyshevskyPeter Jackson
Main castChristian Slater, Colm Meaney, Ving Rhames, James Cromwell, Gennadi VengerovLiv Tyler, Miranda Otto, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies

Synopsis

Soldiers of Fortune

Wealthy thrill-seekers pay huge premiums to have themselves inserted into military adventures, only this time things don't go exactly to plan.

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

Frodo Baggins and the other members of the Fellowship continue on their sacred quest to destroy the One Ring--but on separate paths. Their destinies lie at two towers--Orthanc Tower in Isengard, where the corrupt wizard Saruman awaits, and Sauron's fortress at Barad-dur, deep within the dark lands of Mordor. Frodo and Sam are trekking to Mordor to destroy the One Ring of Power while Gimli, Legolas and Aragorn search for the orc-captured Merry…

Where to watch

Where to watch Soldiers of FortuneWhere to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

More like Soldiers of Fortune · More like The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers · Compare other titles