SPL 2: A Time for Consequences vs Triple Frontier
SPL 2: A Time for Consequences has the higher audience score (6.9/10 against 6.3/10 for Triple Frontier). SPL 2: A Time for Consequences is the shorter watch at 2h compared with 2h 5m. SPL 2: A Time for Consequences is the older of the two (2015 against 2019). Both are action, adventure, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
SPL 2: A Time for Consequences
Triple Frontier| SPL 2: A Time for Consequences | Triple Frontier | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 6.3/10 |
| Year | 2015 | 2019 |
| Length | 2h | 2h 5m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Crime, Thriller | Action, Adventure, Crime, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Soi Cheang | J.C. Chandor |
| Main cast | Tony Jaa, Philip Keung Ho-Man, Wu Jing, Ken Lo Wai-Kwong, Max Zhang | Charlie Hunnam, Oscar Isaac, Pedro Pascal, Garrett Hedlund, Ben Affleck |
Synopsis
SPL 2: A Time for Consequences
A Hong Kong cop named Kit busts a major gangster only to find his cover blown and his main witness gone. The gangster, in retaliation, has him kidnapped and put in a Thai jail with a false criminal identity. Lowly prison guard Chai, with his extraordinary fighting skills, guards Kit and prevents his escape. The prison guard’s daughter suffers from a rare form of leukemia and Kit is the only donor who can save her. The prison guard discovers…
Triple Frontier
Struggling to make ends meet, former special ops soldiers reunite for a high-stakes heist: stealing $75 million from a South American drug lord.
Where to watch
Where to watch SPL 2: A Time for ConsequencesWhere to watch Triple Frontier
More like SPL 2: A Time for Consequences · More like Triple Frontier · Compare other titles