Takers vs Undisputed II: Last Man Standing
Undisputed II: Last Man Standing has the higher audience score (7.3/10 against 6.2/10 for Takers). Undisputed II: Last Man Standing is the shorter watch at 1h 33m compared with 1h 47m. Undisputed II: Last Man Standing is the older of the two (2006 against 2010). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Takers | Undisputed II: Last Man Standing | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 2010 | 2006 |
| Length | 1h 47m | 1h 33m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | John Luessenhop | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Idris Elba, Jay Hernandez, Gaius Charles, Glynn Turman, Marianne Jean-Baptiste | Mark Ivanir, Velizar Binev, Michael Jai White, Scott Adkins, Atanas Srebrev |
Synopsis
Takers
A seasoned team of bank robbers, including Gordon Jennings, John Rahway, A.J., and brothers Jake and Jesse Attica successfully complete their latest heist and lead a life of luxury while planning their next job. When Ghost, a former member of their team, is released from prison he convinces the group to strike an armored car carrying $20 million. As the "Takers" carefully plot out their strategy and draw nearer to exacting the grand heist, a…
Undisputed II: Last Man Standing
Heavyweight Champ George "Iceman" Chambers is sent to a Russian jail on trumped-up drug charges. In order to win his freedom he must fight against the jailhouse fighting champ Uri Boyka in a battle to the death. This time he is not fighting for a title, he is fighting for his life!
Where to watch
Where to watch TakersWhere to watch Undisputed II: Last Man Standing
More like Takers · More like Undisputed II: Last Man Standing · Compare other titles
Takers
Undisputed II: Last Man Standing