Takers vs Undisputed III: Redemption

Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.2/10 for Takers). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 47m. Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Takers posterTakers2010 VS Undisputed III: Redemption posterUndisputed III: Redemption2010
TakersUndisputed III: Redemption
Audience score★ 6.2/10★ 7.5/10
Year20102010
Length1h 47m1h 36m
GenresAction, Crime, Drama, ThrillerAction, Crime, Drama, Thriller
Country–United States of America
DirectorJohn LuessenhopIsaac Florentine
Main castIdris Elba, Jay Hernandez, Gaius Charles, Glynn Turman, Marianne Jean-BaptisteMark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror

Synopsis

Takers

A seasoned team of bank robbers, including Gordon Jennings, John Rahway, A.J., and brothers Jake and Jesse Attica successfully complete their latest heist and lead a life of luxury while planning their next job. When Ghost, a former member of their team, is released from prison he convinces the group to strike an armored car carrying $20 million. As the "Takers" carefully plot out their strategy and draw nearer to exacting the grand heist, a…

Undisputed III: Redemption

Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…

Where to watch

Where to watch TakersWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption

More like Takers · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles