The Devil's Advocate vs Urban Legends: Final Cut
The Devil's Advocate has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 4.9/10 for Urban Legends: Final Cut). Urban Legends: Final Cut is the shorter watch at 1h 38m compared with 2h 24m. The Devil's Advocate is the older of the two (1997 against 2000). Both are horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
The Devil's Advocate
Urban Legends: Final Cut| The Devil's Advocate | Urban Legends: Final Cut | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 4.9/10 |
| Year | 1997 | 2000 |
| Length | 2h 24m | 1h 38m |
| Genres | Drama, Horror, Mystery | Horror, Mystery |
| Country | Germany | United States of America |
| Director | Taylor Hackford | John Ottman |
| Main cast | Chris Bauer, Tamara Tunie, Charlize Theron, Connie Nielsen, Keanu Reeves | Anthony Anderson, Matthew Davis, Anson Mount, Jennifer Morrison, Hart Bochner |
Synopsis
The Devil's Advocate
Aspiring Florida defense lawyer Kevin Lomax accepts a job at a New York law firm. With the stakes getting higher every case, Kevin quickly learns that his boss has something far more evil planned.
Urban Legends: Final Cut
The making of a horror movie takes on a terrifying reality for students at the most prestigious film school in the country. At Alpine University, someone is determined to win the best film award at any cost - even if it means eliminating the competition. No one is safe and everyone is a suspect.
Where to watch
Where to watch The Devil's AdvocateWhere to watch Urban Legends: Final Cut
More like The Devil's Advocate · More like Urban Legends: Final Cut · Compare other titles