The Silence of the Lambs vs To Steal from a Thief
The Silence of the Lambs has the higher audience score (8.3/10 against 6.2/10 for To Steal from a Thief). To Steal from a Thief is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 59m. The Silence of the Lambs is the older of the two (1991 against 2016). Both are crime, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
The Silence of the Lambs
To Steal from a Thief| The Silence of the Lambs | To Steal from a Thief | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.3/10 | ★ 6.2/10 |
| Year | 1991 | 2016 |
| Length | 1h 59m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Thriller | Crime, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Jonathan Demme | Daniel Calparsoro |
| Main cast | Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster, Brooke Smith, Tracey Walter, Anthony Heald | Rodrigo de la Serna, Luis Tosar, Jose Coronado, Luis Callejo, Miquel Fernández |
Synopsis
The Silence of the Lambs
Clarice Starling is a top student at the FBI's training academy. Jack Crawford wants Clarice to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a brilliant psychiatrist who is also a violent psychopath, serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling, as an attractive young woman, may be just the bait to draw him out.
To Steal from a Thief
Valencia, Spain. On a rainy morning, six armed men in disguise assault a bank. But what seemed like an easy heist, quickly goes wrong with nothing unfolding as planned, and mistrust quickly builds between the two leaders of the gang.
Where to watch
Where to watch The Silence of the LambsWhere to watch To Steal from a Thief
More like The Silence of the Lambs · More like To Steal from a Thief · Compare other titles