The Sum of All Fears vs Undisputed III: Redemption

Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.4/10 for The Sum of All Fears). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 2h 4m. The Sum of All Fears is the older of the two (2002 against 2010). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.

The Sum of All Fears posterThe Sum of All Fears2002 VS Undisputed III: Redemption posterUndisputed III: Redemption2010
The Sum of All FearsUndisputed III: Redemption
Audience score★ 6.4/10★ 7.5/10
Year20022010
Length2h 4m1h 36m
GenresAction, Drama, ThrillerAction, Crime, Drama, Thriller
Country–United States of America
DirectorPhil Alden RobinsonIsaac Florentine
Main castRon Rifkin, Bridget Moynahan, Liev Schreiber, Colm Feore, Ben AffleckMark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror

Synopsis

The Sum of All Fears

When the president of Russia suddenly dies, a man whose politics are virtually unknown succeeds him. The change in political leaders sparks paranoia among American CIA officials, so CIA director Bill Cabot recruits a young analyst to supply insight and advice on the situation. Then the unthinkable happens: a nuclear bomb explodes in a U.S. city, and America is quick to blame the Russians.

Undisputed III: Redemption

Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…

Where to watch

Where to watch The Sum of All FearsWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption

More like The Sum of All Fears · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles