The Wolf of Wall Street vs To Die For
The Wolf of Wall Street has the higher audience score (8/10 against 6.6/10 for To Die For). To Die For is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 3h . To Die For is the older of the two (1995 against 2013). Both are comedy, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
The Wolf of Wall Street
To Die For| The Wolf of Wall Street | To Die For | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.0/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2013 | 1995 |
| Length | 3h | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Drama | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Martin Scorsese | Gus Van Sant |
| Main cast | Jon Bernthal, Shea Whigham, Joanna Lumley, Cristin Milioti, Jon Favreau | Nicole Kidman, Joaquin Phoenix, Dan Hedaya, Wayne Knight, Illeana Douglas |
Synopsis
The Wolf of Wall Street
A New York stockbroker refuses to cooperate in a large securities fraud case involving corruption on Wall Street, corporate banking world and mob infiltration. Based on Jordan Belfort's autobiography.
To Die For
Suzanne Stone wants to be a world-famous news anchor and she is willing to do anything to get what she wants. What she lacks in intelligence, she makes up for in cold determination and diabolical wiles. As she pursues her goal with relentless focus, she is forced to destroy anything and anyone that may stand in her way, regardless of the ultimate cost or means necessary.
Where to watch
Where to watch The Wolf of Wall StreetWhere to watch To Die For
More like The Wolf of Wall Street · More like To Die For · Compare other titles