Ticks vs Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 5.7/10 for Ticks). Ticks is the shorter watch at 1h 25m compared with 1h 43m. Ticks is the older of the two (1993 against 2000). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Ticks
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust| Ticks | Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.7/10 | ★ 7.6/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 2000 |
| Length | 1h 25m | 1h 43m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction | Action, Adventure, Animation, Fantasy, Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | Japan |
| Director | Tony Randel | Yoshiaki Kawajiri |
| Main cast | Seth Green, Clint Howard, Rance Howard, Ray Oriel, Rosalind Allen | Takeshi Aono, Yoko Soumi, Hideyuki Tanaka, Koichi Yamadera, Megumi Hayashibara |
Synopsis
Ticks
Teens camping in a northern California retreat are terrorized by mutant insects created by evil, polluting pot farmers.
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust
D, a legendary dhampir competes with a motley family of bounty hunters to track down Charlotte Elbourne, a young woman who has seemingly been abducted by vampire nobleman Meier Link.
Where to watch
Where to watch TicksWhere to watch Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust
More like Ticks · More like Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust · Compare other titles