Underworld: Blood Wars vs World War Z
World War Z has the higher audience score (6.8/10 against 5.9/10 for Underworld: Blood Wars). Underworld: Blood Wars is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 1h 56m. World War Z is the older of the two (2013 against 2016). Both are action, horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Underworld: Blood Wars
World War Z| Underworld: Blood Wars | World War Z | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.9/10 | ★ 6.8/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 31m | 1h 56m |
| Genres | Action, Fantasy, Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Anna Foerster | Marc Forster |
| Main cast | Bradley James, Tobias Menzies, Theo James, Kate Beckinsale, Charles Dance | Matthew Fox, Ruth Negga, Elyes Gabel, Mireille Enos, James Badge Dale |
Synopsis
Underworld: Blood Wars
Vampire death dealer Selene fends off brutal attacks from both the Lycan clan and the Vampire faction that betrayed her. With her only allies, David and his father Thomas, she must stop the eternal war between Lycans and Vampires, even if it means she has to make the ultimate sacrifice.
World War Z
Life for former United Nations investigator Gerry Lane and his family seems content. Suddenly, the world is plagued by a mysterious infection turning whole human populations into rampaging mindless zombies. After barely escaping the chaos, Lane is persuaded to go on a mission to investigate this disease. What follows is a perilous trek around the world where Lane must brave horrific dangers and long odds to find answers before human…
Where to watch
Where to watch Underworld: Blood WarsWhere to watch World War Z
More like Underworld: Blood Wars · More like World War Z · Compare other titles