Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust vs Wolves
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 5.9/10 for Wolves). Wolves is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 43m. Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust is the older of the two (2000 against 2014). Both are action, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust
Wolves| Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust | Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 5.9/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 2014 |
| Length | 1h 43m | 1h 30m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Animation, Fantasy, Horror, Science Fiction | Action, Horror |
| Country | Japan | – |
| Director | Yoshiaki Kawajiri | David Hayter |
| Main cast | Takeshi Aono, Yoko Soumi, Hideyuki Tanaka, Koichi Yamadera, Megumi Hayashibara | Lucas Till, Jason Momoa, Melanie Scrofano, Jennifer Hale, Stephen McHattie |
Synopsis
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust
D, a legendary dhampir competes with a motley family of bounty hunters to track down Charlotte Elbourne, a young woman who has seemingly been abducted by vampire nobleman Meier Link.
Wolves
The coming-of-age story of Cayden Richards. Forced to hit the road after the murder of his parents, Cayden wanders lost without purpose... Until he meets a certifiable lunatic named Wild Joe who sets him on a path to the ominous town of Lupine Ridge to hunt down the truths of his history. But in the end| who's really hunting whom?
Where to watch
Where to watch Vampire Hunter D: BloodlustWhere to watch Wolves
More like Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust · More like Wolves · Compare other titles