Blue Bloods vs Faits divers
Faits divers has the higher audience score (9.2/10 against 7.8/10 for Blue Bloods). Blue Bloods is the older of the two (2010 against 2017). Both are crime, drama shows, so they suit a similar mood.
| Blue Bloods | Faits divers | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 9.2/10 |
| Year | 2010 | 2017 |
| Seasons | 14 | 4 |
| Genres | Crime, Drama | Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | CA |
| Creator / director | Mitchell Burgess, Robin Green | Stéphane Lapointe |
| Main cast | Tom Selleck, Donnie Wahlberg, Bridget Moynahan, Will Estes, Len Cariou | Isabelle Blais, Patrick Hivon, Émile Proulx-Cloutier, Fred-Eric Salvail, Maxime Mailloux |
Synopsis
Blue Bloods
A drama about a multi-generational family of cops dedicated to New York City law enforcement. Frank Reagan is the New York Police Commissioner and heads both the police force and the Reagan brood. He runs his department as diplomatically as he runs his family, even when dealing with the politics that plagued his unapologetically bold father, Henry, during his stint as Chief.
Faits divers
Chief inspector Constance Forest and her team match wits with petty criminals of all kinds in the fog-shrouded North Shore of Montreal.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blue BloodsWhere to watch Faits divers
More like Blue Bloods · More like Faits divers · Compare other titles
Blue Bloods
Faits divers