Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies vs History's Deadliest with Ving Rhames
History's Deadliest with Ving Rhames has the higher audience score (10/10 against 7.7/10 for Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies). Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies is the older of the two (2015 against 2026). Both are documentary shows, so they suit a similar mood.
| Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies | History's Deadliest with Ving Rhames | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.7/10 | ★ 10.0/10 |
| Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Seasons | 1 | 1 |
| Genres | Documentary | Documentary |
| Country | – | – |
| Creator / director | Barak Goodman | – |
| Main cast | Edward Herrmann, Siddhartha Mukherjee | Ving Rhames |
Synopsis
Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies
The documentary series aims to reshape the way the public sees cancer and strip away some of the fear and misunderstanding that has long surrounded it. The story of cancer is a story of human ingenuity, resilience, and perseverance but also of hubris, paternalism and misperception.
History's Deadliest with Ving Rhames
The stories of astonishing places, people and events throughout history that have killed in the most spectacular ways. Each episode reveals the strange truths behind the world's most prolific and powerful killers: from criminals, tyrants and natural disasters to the deadliest weapons, battles - or even islands.
Where to watch
Where to watch Cancer: The Emperor of All MaladiesWhere to watch History's Deadliest with Ving Rhames
More like Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies · More like History's Deadliest with Ving Rhames · Compare other titles
Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies
History's Deadliest with Ving Rhames